If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause issues for users.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. Visit the website are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, safe distance to live from cell phone tower revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for safe distance to live from cell phone tower that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.